Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:27:48 am Ludvig Ericson wrote: > >> On 12 nov 2009, at 14:38, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:44:32 pm Ludvig Ericson wrote: >>> >>>> Why are there comments on PyPI? Moreso, why are there comments >>>> which I cannot control as a package author on my very own >>>> packages? That's just absurd. >>>> >>> No, what's absurd is thinking that the act of publishing software >>> somehow gives you the right to demand control over what others say >>> about your software. >>> >> ... on my own package's page. >> > > It's your package. It's the community's page about your package. > > I think of PyPI as a community-owned noticeboard. Its primary purpose is > to allow the community to find good packages -- the benefit to the > community is why it exists, not the benefit to the author of the > package. > > In my opinion, the community is best served by a good comment/review > system, one which avoids the worst trolling, and allows authors the > right of reply, but does not allow authors to censor inconvenient but > honest reviews. > > +1 :-) Michael -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4