On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:44:30 +0100, Xavier Morel <catch-all at masklinn.net> wrote: > If pypi one day has a CPAN-style buildbot farm allowing it to test the > package on any platform under the sun, that can be included, the tests can > be included as well but given the number of testing solutions (and coverage > discovery associated) that would be quite an undertaking. I'm working on such a thing in my spare time. Yep, it's a big time commitment. http://bitbucket.org/djlyon/pypi-package-testbot/ > And as far as docs go, what would be the criterion? "Has documentation"? Yes. > How do you define "has documentation"? Has auto-extracted documentation > from the docstrings? Yes. > Has a README? Yes Has a complete sphinx package? I don't think there's much that you can rate "objectively" about documentation. You can't do it objectively, but you can use a computer to count the number of lines and come up with a score. Daivd
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4