On Nov 12, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Masklinn wrote: > On 12 Nov 2009, at 22:53 , James Y Knight wrote: >> On Nov 12, 2009, at 4:11 PM, Ben Finney wrote: >>> I think Jesse's point (or, if he's not willing to claim it, my >>> point) is >>> that, compared to the mandatory comment system, it makes much *more* >>> sense to have a mandatory field for “URL to the BTS for this >>> project”. >> >> One might look at the "competition" for inspiration. Looking at >> CPAN. There's no "comments" feature > There is, on search.cpan.org. See http://search.cpan.org/~petdance/ack/ > for instance, the link leads to http://cpanratings.perl.org/ (a > pretty interesting example of the "distributed" nature of cpan in > fact). Ah, I see. I totally managed to miss that...I guess that's an interesting example of a bad web ui. :) James
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4