RetroSearch Browse

Thu Nov 12 22:01:16 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/094093.html

Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I'm going to take a poll RSN, and see what the majority of users
> think (rather than their vocal fraction). Then we can see what to do
> about it.

Yes please! I've been silently waiting for this and have (surprisingly 
for me!) managed to resist joining in the rant.

I'm of the crowd who just wants to make comments (I don't care about 
ratings one way or another, and I can't, sadly, see anyone giving me 
access as to who-voted-less-than-5 so I can follow up with them and see 
what needs to be improved) optional. I'm quite okay with having a banner 
saying "This package has opted not to receive comments". I believe the 
software I release on PyPI is strong enough on its own merits that 
people will use it ;-)

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/094093.html below:

[Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, really?

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/094093.html below:

[Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?

[Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, really?