Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> writes: > On Nov 12, 2009, at 8:06 AM, Jesse Noller wrote: > > > Frankly, I agree with him. As implemented, I *and others* think this > > is broken. I've taken the stance of not publishing things to PyPi > > until A> I find the time to contribute to make it better or B> It > > changes. I'm updating my existing packages, but I have zero interest in publishing new packages to PyPI while it's trying to be a popularity rating and comment system. > That's distressing. For better or worse PyPI is the central repository > of 3rd party packages. That's exactly what we want it to be. The problem is the current implementation is diluting that focus and making it much less attractive to have one's packages there. -- \ “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action, according to our | `\ will, within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of | _o__) others.” —Thomas Jefferson | Ben Finney -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20091113/bce9dfab/attachment-0001.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4