Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Nov 12, 2009, at 8:06 AM, Jesse Noller wrote: > >> Frankly, I agree with him. As implemented, I *and others* think this >> is broken. I've taken the stance of not publishing things to PyPi >> until A> I find the time to contribute to make it better or B> It >> changes. > > That's distressing. For better or worse PyPI is the central repository > of 3rd party packages. It should be easy, desirable, fun and socially > encouraged to get your packages there. I think his point is that a new book announcement servive is different from a book review and rating service. And that mixing the two is 'socially discouraging'. I do not know what the answer is > I personally think a ratings system can be useful, but you should be > able to opt-out of it if you want. Or just write such awesome software > that the bogus bad reviews will be buried by an avalanche of kudos.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4