On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> > wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:44:32 pm Ludvig Ericson wrote: > >> Why are there comments on PyPI? Moreso, why are there comments which > >> I cannot control as a package author on my very own packages? That's > >> just absurd. > > > > No, what's absurd is thinking that the act of publishing software > > somehow gives you the right to demand control over what others say > > about your software. > > > > I don't suppose that this rant of yours has something to do with the > > comment posted today? > > Frankly, I agree with him. As implemented, I *and others* think this > is broken. I've taken the stance of not publishing things to PyPi > until A> I find the time to contribute to make it better or B> It > changes. > Where is the code for PyPi? I took a quick look and didn't turn up anything. -- David blog: http://www.traceback.org twitter: http://twitter.com/dstanek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20091112/d00decf9/attachment.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4