On 03:01 pm, dalcinl at gmail.com wrote: >On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> >wrote: >>On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> >>wrote: >>>On Nov 12, 2009, at 8:06 AM, Jesse Noller wrote: >>>>Frankly, I agree with him. As implemented, I *and others* think this >>>>is broken. I've taken the stance of not publishing things to PyPi >>>>until A> I find the time to contribute to make it better or B> It >>>>changes. >>> >>>That's distressing. For better or worse PyPI is the central >>>repository of >>>3rd party packages. It should be easy, desirable, fun and socially >>>encouraged to get your packages there. >> >>PyPI isn't a place to file bugs, complain something didn't work for >>you if you didn't even have the common decency in some cases to email >>them. Being unable, as an author, to remove, moderate, or even respond >>to issues there bothers me quite a bit. > >I also agree with you. I do not see the point to make PyPI yet another >social network. +1 Jean-Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4