A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/094012.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.7/3.2 release schedule

[Python-Dev] 2.7/3.2 release schedule [Python-Dev] 2.7/3.2 release scheduleGuido van Rossum guido at python.org
Wed Nov 11 03:46:50 CET 2009
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:
>
> [Guido van Rossum]
>>
>> . We used to have releases once a year and
>> we got really big serious feedback from our biggest users that the
>> release cycle was going too fast. We discussed it amply and agreed on
>> a minimum time of 18 months between releases.
>
> If the language moratorium goes into effect,

"If"? It's already Approved. :-)

> would shorter release cycles
> still have a negative impact?  Do people possibly want slower changes
> to the language and faster updates to the library?
>
> I don't know the answer.  Just asking how this matches up with the
> feedback you have gotten previously.

I expect it wouldn't make a difference since backwards compatibility
testing involves a lot more than language syntax.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4