On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldoussoren at mac.com> wrote: > > What's so bad about IDLE that you'd like to replace it? That was exactly my previous question. You don't use IDLE either, so why not to replace it with something that you can actually use, with something that is at least extensible? So people will be interested to learn and contribute. > The obvious alternative to replacing IDLE is to fix whatever is wrong with it. It is also obvious that developer would better download a decent editor than bog their mind with once perspective, but now dead technology IDLE was build upon. -- anatoly t.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4