[MvL] >> I personally think that decoupling the releases would be best, i.e. >> not start thinking about 3.2 for another 6 months. [Benjamin] > The problem with that is that there is a period of time where 2.x has > features which 3.x doesn't. My preference is to move back the whole > schedule 6 months. My preference is to decouple and let 2.7 go out 18 months after 2.6. In general, 2.x users should not have to pay a price for whatever we do with 3.x. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4