On Nov 10, 2009, at 8:28 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Barry Warsaw wrote: >> I don't think it's worth making a quick 2.6.5 release for this if >> it's >> primary intent is to produce new Windows binaries. I'm okay with >> making >> the changes to the tree, but we'll release 2.6.5 on a "normal" >> schedule. > > Perhaps publish a source patch relative to 2.6.4 for people that would > like to rebuild their own Windows binaries with just that change? +1. A link to that could easily go on the 2.6.4 page. Perhaps the right way to do it is to put the blessed patch in roundup and add a link to that patch file on the website. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20091110/6c2ff832/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4