Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan <at> gmail.com> writes: > > It's also one of the major reasons for not sharing mutable containers > between threads if you can avoid it (and serialising access to them if > you can't) Not necessarily, for example it is common to rely on the fact that list.append() is atomic. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4