Nick Coghlan wrote: > Ben Finney wrote: >> anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Quite an interesting question recently popped up in pygame community >>> that I'd like to ask to Python developers. >> This forum is specifically about development *of* Python. > > Anatoly's question is actually a fair one for python-dev - we're the > ones that *ship* Idle, so it is legitimate to ask our reasons for > continuing to do so. But he didn't - instead, he asked how many of us use it. Usage by committers is not (or shouldn't be) a primary criterion for including or not including something. Instead, usage in the community should be, and python-dev is indeed the wrong place to estimate that. OTOH, the second (or, rather, third) question (does anybody think it should be replaced) is indeed on-topic for python-dev. I didn't really answer that question before, so I do now: I have not personally plans to replace it, and I'm skeptical wrt. anybody else's plans unless there is specific code in existence that IDLE could be replaced *with*. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4