Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093956.html below:

[Python-Dev] decimal.py: == and != comparisons involving NaNs

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] decimal.py: == and != comparisons involving NaNs
• Next message: [Python-Dev] decimal.py: == and != comparisons involving NaNs
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Stefan Krah <stefan-usenet <at> bytereef.org> writes:
> 
> I guess my point is that NaNs in lists and dicts are broken in so many
> ways that it might be good to discourage this use. (And get the added
> benefit of safer mathematical behavior for == and !=.)

Giving users seemingly random and unexplainable exceptions would not be a good
way to discourage it, though.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] decimal.py: == and != comparisons involving NaNs
• Next message: [Python-Dev] decimal.py: == and != comparisons involving NaNs
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4