A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093936.html below:

[Python-Dev] IDLE as default Python editor (Was: [pygame] Python IDE for windoz)

[Python-Dev] IDLE as default Python editor (Was: [pygame] Python IDE for windoz)anatoly techtonik techtonik at gmail.com
Mon Nov 9 07:45:30 CET 2009
Hello,

Quite an interesting question recently popped up in pygame community
that I'd like to ask to Python developers.

How many of you use IDLE?
What's wrong with it?

>From my side I like the idea of having default Python editor that is
small, fast, convenient and extensible/embeddable. IDLE is small and
fast, but I feel really uncomfortable with its. The worst thing - I
can't change it. Does anybody else feel the same to think if we could
replace IDLE with something more maintainable by providing Scintilla
bindings, for example?

Regards,
-- 
anatoly t.



On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:15 PM, RB[0] <roebros at gmail.com> wrote:
> Most? people just don't like it - personally it's all I use, Windows or
> otherwise...
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kris Schnee <kschnee at xepher.net> wrote:
>>
>> What's wrong with the built-in editor, IDLE?
>
>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4