John Arbash Meinel wrote: > He wanted to introduce a moratorium at least partially because he was > tired of endless threads about anonymous code blocks, etc. Which aren't > going to be included in the language anyway, so he may as well make a > point to say "and neither will anything else for a while". I have not said anything on this topic either way. But I think a general moratorium is a false solution to that particular problem. Guido should just make a clear pronouncement (again) and let people quote that in response to initial posts, before they *appear* to gain steam. Each time Python doubles in popularity, the number of people wanting such things will approximately double. That is the price of success. Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4