On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > Willem, the rationale for this PEP is to give alternative > implementations the chance to catch up with CPython. > > Given your statement that CLPython is quite complete on the language > level, but missing standard library features, how do you think the > moratorium will help CLPython? It would be great to have a pause in Python-the-language, so that CLPython might at the end of the moratorium finally be up to date with the latest 2.x and 3.x features. Supporting standard libraries is a bigger challenge, as the ones written in C need rewriting. Whether or not there is a pause on that front does not matter too much to that situation. - Willem
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4