On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 14:20, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta at gmail.com> wrote: > 2009-11-03 18:35:10 Guido van Rossum napisał(a): >> I've checked draft (!) PEP 3003, "Python Language Moratorium", into >> SVN. As authors I've listed Jesse, Brett and myself. >> >> On python-ideas the moratorium idea got fairly positive responses >> (more positive than I'd expected, in fact) but I'm bracing myself for >> fierce discussion here on python-dev. It's important to me that if if >> this is accepted it is a "rough consensus" decision (working code we >> already have plenty of :-), not something enforced by a vocal minority >> or an influential individual such as myself. If there's too much >> opposition I'll withdraw the PEP so as not to waste everybody's time >> with a fruitless discussion. >> >> The PEP tries to spell out some gray areas but I'm sure there will be >> others; that's life. Do note that the PEP proposes to be *retroactive* >> back to the 3.1 release, i.e. the "frozen" version of the language is >> the state in which it was released as 3.1. > > Does moratorium allow to add support for e.g. 'from __future__ import yield_from' > in Python 3.2? No. -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4