RetroSearch Browse

Thu Nov 5 17:29:26 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093785.html

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 at 16:06, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:08:58 +0100, Martin v. LÃ¶wis a Ã©critÂ :
>>> Since wide unicode is the standard chosen by some Linux distributions,
>>> it would make sense to have at least one buildbot running with
>>> --with-wide-unicode (3.x) or --enable-unicode=ucs4 (2.x).
>>
>> Can you propose some (one? two? more?) systems that might be best as
>> candidates? I'd then setup two (sets of) builders; they would share the
>> slave lock, so builds would run sequentially (unless the slave operator
>> agrees to setup two slaves on one machine).
>
> I would certainly agree to setup two slaves on mine. There are ample
> resources available.

I could do so as well.  Gentoo is one of the distributions that uses
the wide build by default, so that would make it a good test candidate
as well.

--David

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093785.html below:

[Python-Dev] No buildbot to test wide unicode?