Raymond Hettinger wrote: > Summarizing my opposition to a new set method: > 1) there already are at least two succinct ways to get the same effect > 2) those ways work with any container, not just sets > 3) set implementations in other languages show that this isn't needed. > 4) there is value to keeping the API compact > 5) isn't needed for optimization (selecting the same value in a loop > makes no sense) > 6) absence of real-world code examples that would be meaningfully improved > > I would be happy to add an example to the docs so that this thread > can finally end. Please do! Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4