A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093730.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?

[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line? [Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?Carl Trachte ctrachte at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 19:39:43 CET 2009
On 11/4/09, ssteinerX at gmail.com <ssteinerx at gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe the 3.x line should just be put out of our misery, merged back
> to 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, and proceed as Glyph suggested in passing with
> increasing levels of deprecation until it just turns into 3.x on its
> own by running out of numbers.

<delurk>
As a user, I'm horrified.  Granted, I'm not the most high powered
user, but . . .
my employer is already providing me with a 3.0 Python version on one
of my work computers with the expectation that I'll be using it more
and more.

Sorry to butt in, but is this a joke?  I thought all this was hashed
out prior to inventing python 3.0.
</delurk>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4