RetroSearch Browse

Wed Nov 4 19:20:42 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093728.html

On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:06 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:

> 2009/11/3 ssteinerX at gmail.com <ssteinerx at gmail.com>:
>>
>> On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:26 PM, James Y Knight wrote:
>>>
>>> It really sounds like you're saying that switching to 3.x isn't  
>>> worth the
>>> cost to you, but you want to force people (including yourself) to  
>>> do so
>>> anyways, because ...?
>>
>> Because that's the future of Python
>
> Or not. Maybe it's a dead branch of Python?

Maybe the 3.x line should just be put out of our misery, merged back  
to 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, and proceed as Glyph suggested in passing with  
increasing levels of deprecation until it just turns into 3.x on its  
own by running out of numbers.

S

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093728.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?