On Nov 3, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > Barry Warsaw wrote: >> On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> >>> I've checked draft (!) PEP 3003, "Python Language Moratorium", into >>> SVN. As authors I've listed Jesse, Brett and myself. >>> >>> On python-ideas the moratorium idea got fairly positive responses >>> (more positive than I'd expected, in fact) but I'm bracing myself >>> for >>> fierce discussion here on python-dev. It's important to me that if >>> if >>> this is accepted it is a "rough consensus" decision (working code we >>> already have plenty of :-), not something enforced by a vocal >>> minority >>> or an influential individual such as myself. If there's too much >>> opposition I'll withdraw the PEP so as not to waste everybody's time >>> with a fruitless discussion. >>> >>> The PEP tries to spell out some gray areas but I'm sure there will >>> be >>> others; that's life. Do note that the PEP proposes to be >>> *retroactive* >>> back to the 3.1 release, i.e. the "frozen" version of the language >>> is >>> the state in which it was released as 3.1. >> >> I think this is a great idea. I'd love to see the energy normally >> put into evolving the language into making the stdlib really kick >> ass. >> > > +lots Ditto. Doug
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4