Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >> I've checked draft (!) PEP 3003, "Python Language Moratorium", into >> SVN. As authors I've listed Jesse, Brett and myself. >> >> On python-ideas the moratorium idea got fairly positive responses >> (more positive than I'd expected, in fact) but I'm bracing myself for >> fierce discussion here on python-dev. It's important to me that if if >> this is accepted it is a "rough consensus" decision (working code we >> already have plenty of :-), not something enforced by a vocal minority >> or an influential individual such as myself. If there's too much >> opposition I'll withdraw the PEP so as not to waste everybody's time >> with a fruitless discussion. >> >> The PEP tries to spell out some gray areas but I'm sure there will be >> others; that's life. Do note that the PEP proposes to be *retroactive* >> back to the 3.1 release, i.e. the "frozen" version of the language is >> the state in which it was released as 3.1. > > I think this is a great idea. I'd love to see the energy normally put > into evolving the language into making the stdlib really kick ass. > +lots Michael > -Barry > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4