> It's pretty easy to make Python source that works under 2.6 and 3.x. > It's basically impossible to make Python source that works under 2.4/2.5 > and 3.x. You may be able to write code that works under 2.4/2.5 and > works cleanly with 2to3 to produce 3.x code. I haven't tried that > route, though in theory it should work. All you really need is syntax > compatibility. I have tried that route for a number of projects, and I think it works really well. It is also supported by distribute. > In a nutshell, I don't think you need two branches to support an > extension module on Python 2 and Python 3. > > YMMV. Exactly my experience as well. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4