A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093625.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?

[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line? [Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?Georg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Tue Nov 3 18:39:21 CET 2009
skip at pobox.com schrieb:
>     Martin> And if *2.6* becomes the last of the 2.x series?
> 
> With all due respect, I don't think you can make that decision now.  The
> time to have stated 2.6 would be the end of the 2.x line was when 2.6 was
> released.  At that point instead of opening up the trunk for changes you
> would have closed it off or merged the py3k branch to trunk.  2.6.0 was
> released over a year ago and there has been no effort to suppress bug fix or
> feature additions to trunk since then.  If you call 2.6 "the end of 2.x"
> you'll have wasted a year of work on 2.7 with about a month to go before the
> first 2.7 alpha release.

+1.

Georg

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4