On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:04 AM, James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net> wrote: >> If that happens, it's not true that there's *nowhere* to go. A >> solution >> would be to discard 3.x as a failed experiment, take everything >> that is >> useful from it and port it to 2.x, and simply continue development >> from the >> last 2.x release. And from there, features can be deprecated and then >> removed a few releases later, as is the usual policy. >> >> Been there, done that, on a couple other projects. It's unfortunate >> when you >> have to throw out work you've done because it failed to gain >> traction over >> the thing you tried to replace, but sometimes that's life. > > I'm not ready for that yet. I think there's plenty of time before we > have to agree to such a bleak view. In the mean time let's do > something practical like help NumPy port to Py3k. Or, for example, Django... S
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4