A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093603.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?

[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line? [Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?ssteinerX@gmail.com ssteinerx at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 14:43:06 CET 2009
On Nov 3, 2009, at 1:07 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:

> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:48 PM, ssteinerX at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> A better language, i.e. Python 3.x, will become better faster  
>>> without
>>> dragging the 2.x series out any longer.
>>
>> If Python 2.7 becomes the last of the 2.x series, then I personally
>> favor back porting as many features from Python 3 as possible.
>
> And if *2.6* becomes the last of the 2.x series?

Then I'd guess that that would annoy the crap out of everyone who's  
put so much effort into 2.7 and all of us who have been waiting for  
what I hope will finally be the "now ports way more easily to 3.0"  
version.

S

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4