On Nov 3, 2009, at 1:07 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Barry Warsaw wrote: >> On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:48 PM, ssteinerX at gmail.com wrote: >> >>> A better language, i.e. Python 3.x, will become better faster >>> without >>> dragging the 2.x series out any longer. >> >> If Python 2.7 becomes the last of the 2.x series, then I personally >> favor back porting as many features from Python 3 as possible. > > And if *2.6* becomes the last of the 2.x series? Then I'd guess that that would annoy the crap out of everyone who's put so much effort into 2.7 and all of us who have been waiting for what I hope will finally be the "now ports way more easily to 3.0" version. S
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4