RetroSearch Browse

Tue Nov 3 04:48:46 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093576.html

On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:26 PM, James Y Knight wrote:
>
> It really sounds like you're saying that switching to 3.x isn't  
> worth the cost to you, but you want to force people (including  
> yourself) to do so anyways, because ...?

Because that's the future of Python, where the developers who make  
real base language improvements are focusing their attention, and  
because the language would advance faster without this split attention.

A better language, i.e. Python 3.x, will become better faster without  
dragging the 2.x series out any longer.

S

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093576.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?