Guido van Rossum <guido <at> python.org> writes: > > Is it even wort doing a 2.7 release? Isn't the effort better spent on > 3.2 alone? (Note, these aren't rhetorical questions. It's well > possible that there are good reasons for pushing along with 2.7. Maybe > considering those reasons will also help answering questions about > whether to backport things like nonlocal.) 2.7 has an up-to-date backport of the C IO lib (as well as the memoryview object), which means it is better for people wanting to ease transition to 3.x. But of course, as Martin said, few people will want to support 2.7 only and not 2.6.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4