A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/093528.html below:

[Python-Dev] Retrieve an arbitrary element from a set withoutremoving it

[Python-Dev] Retrieve an arbitrary element from a set withoutremoving it [Python-Dev] Retrieve an arbitrary element from a set withoutremoving itAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Nov 2 11:21:05 CET 2009
Cameron Simpson <cs <at> zip.com.au> writes:
> 
> Personally, I'm for the iteration spec in a lot of ways.
> 
> Firstly, a .get()/.pick() that always returns the same element feels
> horrible. Is there anyone here who _likes_ it?

I do. Since the caller is asking for an arbitrary element, returning the same
element is legitimate. It's funny how people seem to have a problem with the
word "arbitrary" :)

And I'm -1 on any implicit iteration attaching some state to the object. If you
want to iterate, there's already an obvious way to it.

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4