Brett Cannon wrote: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 13:39, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote: > >>> As I said: Python 2 support is not only about supporting old versions of >>> Python, >>> but also supporting users of Python2-only modules. So 2.7 support will >>> for the most part be a case not of supporting Python versions, but >>> Python *users*. And contrary to what Antoine said, that *is* a good >>> reason to backport it. >>> >> FWIW, I support backporting the nonlocal-keyword in 2.7. >> All of the reasons for introducting nonlocal to 3.x also apply to 2.x. >> Using the nonlocal keyword in clear and explicit, especially >> when compared to the existing workarounds which are not pretty. >> > > We are voting, I'm -0. > nonlocal is really useful for tests so I'd love to have this in 2.7, but obviously someone has to do the work so I'm only +0. Michael > -Brett > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4