A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089664.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 384: Defining a Stable ABI

[Python-Dev] PEP 384: Defining a Stable ABI [Python-Dev] PEP 384: Defining a Stable ABIDirkjan Ochtman dirkjan at ochtman.nl
Sun May 17 23:47:07 CEST 2009
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:54 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> Excluded Functions
> ------------------
>
> Functions declared in the following header files are not part
> of the ABI:
> - cellobject.h
> - classobject.h
> - code.h
> - frameobject.h
> - funcobject.h
> - genobject.h
> - pyarena.h
> - pydebug.h
> - symtable.h
> - token.h
> - traceback.h

What kind of effect does this have on optimization efforts, for
example all the stuff done by Antoine Pitrou over the last few months,
and the first few results from unladen? Will it mean we won't get to
the good optimizations until 4.0? Or does it just mean unladen swallow
takes longer to come back to trunk (until 4.0) and every extension
author who wants to be compatible with it will basically have the same
burden as now?

Cheers,

Dirkjan
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4