Paul Moore wrote: > 2009/5/9 Chris Withers <chris at simplistix.co.uk>: >> Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>>> I thought .pth files just had python in them? >>> Not at all - they never did. They have paths in them. >> I've certainly seen them with python in, and that's what I hate about >> them... > > AIUI, there was a small special case that lines starting with "import" > are executed (see the source of site.py for details). This exception > has been exploited (some would say "abused", but I'm trying to be > unbiased here) by setuptools, at least, to do path manipulations and > such. Abused is definitely the right word, I suppose it's too late to correct this bug? How about for Python 3? cheers, Chris
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4