RetroSearch Browse

Sat May 9 16:07:01 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089555.html

Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20090509 13:40], "Martin v. Löwis" (martin at v.loewis.de) wrote:
>> There are a few others, though: zope.*, repoze.*, redturtle.*, iw.*,
>> plone.*, pycopia.*, p4a.*, plonehrm.*, plonetheme.*, pbp.*, lovely.*,
>> xm.*, paste.*, Products.*, buildout.*, five.*, silva.*, tl.*, 	tw.*,
>> themerubber.*, themetweaker.*, zc.*, z3c.*, zgeo.*, z3ext.*, etc.
> 
> Can be fairly said, though, that the majority of those you just named are
> related to Zope?

They're also all pure namespace packages rather than base + addons, 
which is what we've been discussing...

> That would explain why I won't know of them as I avoid Zope like the plague.

More fool you...

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089555.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 382: Namespace Packages