RetroSearch Browse

Sat May 9 13:24:55 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089551.html

-On [20090501 20:59], "Martin v. Löwis" (martin at v.loewis.de) wrote:
>Right: if all portions install into the same directory, you can have
>base packages already.

Speaking as a user of packages, this use case is one I hardly ever encounter
with the Python software/modules/packages I use. The only ones that spring
to mind are the mx.* and ll.* packages. The rest simply create their own
namespace as <package>.*, but there's nothing that uses that same namespace
and installs separately from the base package that I know of.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
Knowledge was inherent in all things. The world was a library...

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089551.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 382: Namespace Packages