Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 18:56, John Arbash Meinel > <john.arbash.meinel at gmail.com <mailto:john.arbash.meinel at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Andrew Bennetts wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> Robert Kern <robert.kern <at> gmail.com <http://gmail.com>> writes: > >>> Since one may have more than one filesystem side-by-side, this > can't be just > >> be > >>> a system-wide boolean somewhere. One would have to query the > target directory > >>> for this information. I am not aware of the existence of code > that does such > >> a > >>> query, though. > >> Or you can just be practical and test for it. Create a file > "foobar" and see if > >> you can open "FOOBAR" in read mode... > > > > Agreed. That is how Bazaar's test suite detects this, and it > works well. > > > > -Andrew. > > > Actually, I believe we do: > > open('format', 'wb').close() > try: > os.lstat('FoRmAt') > except IOError, e: > if e.errno == errno.ENOENT: > ... > > I don't know that it really matters, just wanted to indicate we use > 'lstat' rather than 'open()' to check. I could be wrong about the test > suite, but I know that is what we do for 'live' files. (We always create > a format file, so we know it is there to 'stat' it via a different > name.) > > > Thanks for the help to everyone. I ended up simply taking __file__, > making it all uppercase (or lowercase if it is already uppercase) and > then doing os.path.exists() on the modified name. Seems to work. > Alternatively, use swapcase() and then os.path.exists().
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4