On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 18:56, John Arbash Meinel < john.arbash.meinel at gmail.com> wrote: > Andrew Bennetts wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> Robert Kern <robert.kern <at> gmail.com> writes: > >>> Since one may have more than one filesystem side-by-side, this can't be > just > >> be > >>> a system-wide boolean somewhere. One would have to query the target > directory > >>> for this information. I am not aware of the existence of code that does > such > >> a > >>> query, though. > >> Or you can just be practical and test for it. Create a file "foobar" and > see if > >> you can open "FOOBAR" in read mode... > > > > Agreed. That is how Bazaar's test suite detects this, and it works well. > > > > -Andrew. > > > Actually, I believe we do: > > open('format', 'wb').close() > try: > os.lstat('FoRmAt') > except IOError, e: > if e.errno == errno.ENOENT: > ... > > I don't know that it really matters, just wanted to indicate we use > 'lstat' rather than 'open()' to check. I could be wrong about the test > suite, but I know that is what we do for 'live' files. (We always create > a format file, so we know it is there to 'stat' it via a different name.) Thanks for the help to everyone. I ended up simply taking __file__, making it all uppercase (or lowercase if it is already uppercase) and then doing os.path.exists() on the modified name. Seems to work. -Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090508/7fd64c45/attachment.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4