RetroSearch Browse

Fri May 8 00:27:08 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089514.html

Terry Reedy wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> Given your explanation of what the new 'surrogates' handler does (pass
>>> rather than reject erroneous surrogates), I think 'surrogates_pass' is
>>> fine.  Thus, I considoer that and 'surrogates_excape' the best proposal
>>> the best so far and suggest that you make this pair the current status
>>> quo to be argued against and improved ... or not.
>>
>> That's exactly what I want to avoid: more bike-shedding. If this is now
>> changed, it cannot be possibly be argued against and improved - it would
>> be final, end of discussion (please!!!).
>>
>> So I'm happy to make it "surrogatepass" and "surrogateescape" as
>> proposed by Walter. I'm sure you didn't really mean the spelling of
>> "excape" to be taken literally - whether or not you meant the plural
>> and the underscore literally, I cannot tell. Stephen Turnbull approved
>> singular, so that's good enough for me.
> 
> Those minor tweaks for consistency with existing names are what I meant 
> by 'improve' (with good arguments) and I approve of them also. +1 on 
> stopping here.
> 
We argue because we care. :-)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089514.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 383 update: utf8b is now the error handler