On approximately 5/6/2009 6:33 AM, came the following characters from the keyboard of Stephen J. Turnbull: > "Martin v. Löwis" writes: > > In any case, Python 3.1b1 may get released today, so it's way too late > > for new features in the PEP. They can wait for Python 3.2. > > You have convinced me that the PEP should wait as well. > > In its current form it is incomplete and dangerous. I see nothing in this thread that suggests that the PEP is dangerous in its current form. While I (still) think that more readable transcodings could have been used, and while I had difficulty fully understanding the PEP at first, now that I think I do understand the PEP, and it has been somewhat clarified and amended, I cannot see how it could be dangerous. A specific case of danger should be included with such a statement. Regarding incomplete, I agree it won't brush my teeth for me, but I think it does solve the problem it sets out to solve. -- Glenn -- http://nevcal.com/ =========================== A protocol is complete when there is nothing left to remove. -- Stuart Cheshire, Apple Computer, regarding Zero Configuration Networking
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4