RetroSearch Browse

Mon May 4 21:11:06 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089392.html

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:

> So: you don't need it, it clutters up our code (particularly typeobject.c),
> and it adds overhead.  The only good reason to keep it is backwards
> compatibility, which I admit is a fine reason.
>

If you make the change, will 3rd party code that relies on it fail in
unexpected ways, or will they just get a compile error?

--
Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D.
President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090504/a2036015/attachment.htm>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089392.html below:

drop unnecessary "context" pointer from PyGetSetDef