Hi, Larry Hastings wrote: > > Mark Dickinson wrote: >> >> Still, binary compatibility seems like a fairly strong reason not to >> remove the closure field. > > My understanding is that there a) 2.x extension modules are not binary > compatible with 3.x, and b) there are essentially no 3.x extension modules > in the field. Is that accurate? If we don't have an installed base (yet) > to worry about, now's the time to make this change. cx_Oracle at least uses this closure field, and has already been ported to 3.x: http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=Connection_SetOCIAttr+trunk -- Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4