Alas, I haven't been following it either recently. Too bad, really, because before I left (now three weeks ago) it was already pretty close. We could perhaps even check in Greg's patch (which I tried and looked like a solid implementation of his proposal at the time) and finagle it for b2. One problem though is that Greg's code is based on 2.6... On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > What's the status of yield from? There's still a small window open for > a patch to be checked into 3.1's branch. I haven't been following the > python-ideas threads, so I'm not sure if it's ready yet. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4