Michael Foord wrote: > MRAB wrote: >> Benjamin Peterson wrote: >>> 2009/5/1 MRAB <google at mrabarnett.plus.com>: >>>> I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used >>>> more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used >>>> for "Accepted" and "Active" instead of them both being 'A', for >>>> example? >>>> >>>> -> A - Accepted proposal >>>> -> R - Rejected proposal >>>> W - Withdrawn proposal >>>> -> D - Deferred proposal >>>> F - Final proposal >>>> -> A - Active proposal >>>> -> D - Draft proposal >>>> -> R - Replaced proposal >>> >>> Yes, that makes more sense. Would you like to submit a patch against >>> the PEP 0 generator? (It's in peps/pep0) >>> >> I'm still trying to think which letters to use! > > P for Proposal (to replace Active Proposal)? Every active PEP is a > proposal... > The full list is: S - Standards Track PEP I - Informational PEP P - Process PEP A - Accepted proposal R - Rejected proposal W - Withdrawn proposal D - Deferred proposal F - Final proposal A - Active proposal D - Draft proposal R - Replaced proposal using one letter from each set. From looking more closely at the code: Only 'Informational' or 'Process' PEPs can be 'Active'. 'Draft' and 'Active' are shown as a single space instead of 'D' or 'A'. Therefore: S - Standards Track PEP I - Informational PEP P - Process PEP A - Accepted proposal R - Rejected proposal W - Withdrawn proposal D - Deferred proposal F - Final proposal [A - Active proposal # blank, so can be omitted from key] [D - Draft proposal # blank, so can be omitted from key] R - Replaced proposal leaving just 'Rejected' and 'Replaced' to be disambiguated.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4