RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 30 19:37:17 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087938.html

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Neil Hodgson <nyamatongwe at gmail.com> wrote:
...
> while so I can't remember the details. The current Python project
> files are hierarchical, building several DLLs and an EXE and I think
> this was outside the scope of the tools I looked at.

Not sure I understand.
Having a project which builds (shared) libraries and executables which
use them (and which maybe have to be executed later on during the
build) is no problem for CMake, also with the VisualStudio projects.
>From what I remember when I wrote the CMake files for python it was
quite straight forward.

Alex

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087938.html below:

[Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement