Tres Seaver a écrit : > > Note that the kind of applications I work on tend to be the sort which > will run as server apps, and which will (in production) be the entire > rasion d'etre for the machine they run on, which makes the cost of > isolation tiny compared to the consequences of failed isolation. > Indeed. More fundamentally, different use cases call for the dependency management to happen in different places. In the case of the web application, the dependencies must be resolved on the developper machine, and tested there, then the full bundle is pushed to the production server where failure is not an option. This is in strong contrast with the Debian (for example) use case, where you want the dependencies to be resolved on the end user machine, because that way Debian has to support just N independant packages, not NxN possible user configurations. Cheers, B.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4