RetroSearch Browse

Sun Mar 29 15:35:31 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087903.html

It'd be worthy of fixing in 2.6 since the module exists.  Though honestly...
who cares about Irix?

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:53 PM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com>wrote:

> I'm reviewing http://bugs.python.org/issue2591, which is marked as
> 'security' because it is a potential buffer overflow.  almodule.c has
> been dropped in py3k, so my impulse is to close the bug as "won't fix".
> But I thought I should check in to find out what the policy is before
> doing that since it is a 'security' bug.
>
> --
> R. David Murray     http://www.bitdance.com
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/greg%40krypto.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090329/f5db4889/attachment.htm>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087903.html below:

[Python-Dev] Are buffer overflows in modules deleted in py3k ignorable?