On 29/03/2009 1:41 AM, andrew cooke wrote: > Mark Hammond wrote: >> On 28/03/2009 9:50 PM, andrew cooke wrote: >>> Tim Roberts wrote: >>>> [...] IronPython has certainly shown that Python can be successfully >>>> implemented in a JIT compiled VM in a performant way, but it has issues >>>> running C extension modules. >>>> >>>> I'll be curious to see where this project goes. >>> given the comments on python-dev i wonder if this is the first >>> indication >>> that python is going to split into separate implementations for windows >>> and unix (via .net and llvm, respectively)? >> What comments are they? There is no indication that unladen-swallow is >> fundamentally broken for Windows, just temporarily broken due to the >> lack of windows developers/contributors... > > the comments you are referring to - that windows is not a priority, that > they currently have no testing on windows machines, etc. i quote, for > example: "None of the three of us have Windows machines, nor do we > particularly want to acquire them :), and Windows support isn't going to > be a big priority." > >> Saying-no-to-fud ly, > > which part of "i wonder" don't you understand? i'm not saying it is true, > i'm just discussing the possibility. Fair enough - although its reasonable for people to look for some indication of what you are saying to have some basis in reality, surely? > i am getting a little tired of people here acting so defensively... Which part of my reply did you think was defensive? I wasn't suggesting such a split would necessarily be a bad idea, just that there was no evidence of it. IMO discussing such a split would create a huge amount of FUD, generating a huge amount of wasted energy if it wasn't true. > i'm discussing a programming language, not the size of your dick. Wow, talk about jumping to conclusions :) Is there something you feel the need to get off your chest? Mark
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4