At 12:53 PM 3/28/2009 +1200, Greg Ewing wrote: >Guido van Rossum wrote: > >>Perhaps the crux is that *if* you accidentally use "return <value>" in >>a vanilla generator expecting the value to show up somewhere, you are >>probably enough of a newbie that debugging this will be quite hard. >>I'd like not to have such a newbie trap lying around. > >Okay, so would you be happy if the for-loop were to >raise an exception if it gets a StopIteration whose >value is not None? Wouldn't it have to be more than just for-loops? What about list(), map(), ...? It seems a lot simpler to just make it use a different exception, as nothing else has to change for that to work correctly; the new construct can just catch it, and everywhere else it's an error.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4